-84.0%
FIG vs EPAM
+1.2%
-85.3%
-86.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -16.7% | +20.6% | -37.3% | -24.3% |
| 7D | -17.4% | +23.0% | -40.4% | -25.8% |
| 30D | -15.9% | +51.6% | -67.5% | -32.3% |
| 3M | -34.5% | +50.8% | -85.3% | -47.1% |
| 6M | -5.0% | +51.1% | -56.2% | -25.5% |
| YTD | -50.7% | -19.1% | -31.5% | -52.0% |
| 1Y | -58.1% | +3.0% | -61.1% | -62.5% |
| All | -84.0% | +1.2% | -85.3% | -85.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling