+49.3%
FERG vs UMC
+252.9%
-203.5%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.5% | +1.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +11.4% | -12.4% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -11.8% | +16.8% | -28.6% | -13.7% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +19.1% | -20.3% | -5.0% |
| 6M | -2.3% | +137.4% | -139.7% | -17.6% |
| YTD | +0.8% | +186.4% | -185.6% | -20.2% |
| 1Y | +0.5% | +229.1% | -228.6% | -23.7% |
| All | +49.3% | +252.9% | -203.5% | +10.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling