-2.3%
FERG vs UMC
+209.4%
-211.7%
-18.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | +4.6% | -2.3% | +2.1% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +5.0% | -5.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -10.2% | +7.7% | -17.9% | -10.5% |
| 3M | -0.6% | +1.7% | -2.2% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -6.5% | +113.9% | -120.4% | -10.7% |
| YTD | +4.2% | +168.9% | -164.7% | -1.7% |
| 1Y | -2.3% | +207.2% | -209.5% | -8.7% |
| All | -2.3% | +209.4% | -211.7% | -8.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling