+50.4%
FERG vs CLSK
+211.4%
-161.0%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +6.8% | -6.1% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -2.6% | +7.7% | -10.3% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -8.9% | +12.2% | -21.1% | -9.9% |
| 3M | -2.0% | -15.5% | +13.4% | -1.5% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +39.3% | -42.5% | -7.1% |
| YTD | +1.5% | +35.1% | -33.6% | -3.1% |
| 1Y | +0.5% | +34.0% | -33.5% | -5.0% |
| 3Y | +50.4% | +226.3% | -175.8% | +36.6% |
| All | +50.4% | +211.4% | -161.0% | +36.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling