+50.9%
FERG vs BIIB
-19.0%
+69.9%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.8% | -0.5% | -1.2% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -5.4% | +6.3% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -15.1% | +1.7% | -16.8% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -4.8% | +5.8% | -10.7% | -6.5% |
| 6M | -2.5% | +11.9% | -14.4% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +1.8% | +19.7% | -17.9% | -3.9% |
| 1Y | -0.3% | +46.7% | -47.1% | -11.3% |
| All | +50.9% | -19.0% | +69.9% | +54.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling