+51.5%
FE vs NIO
-64.6%
+116.1%
-14.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.6% | +1.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -13.0% | +15.0% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -18.3% | +17.1% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +3.5% | -33.2% | +36.7% | +4.1% |
| 6M | -6.1% | -21.5% | +15.4% | -5.9% |
| YTD | +7.6% | -25.5% | +33.1% | +7.8% |
| 1Y | +11.9% | -38.0% | +49.9% | +12.3% |
| All | +51.5% | -64.6% | +116.1% | +51.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling