+46.7%
FE vs ACGL
+35.5%
+11.1%
-15.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +6.4% | -5.8% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +6.4% | +16.6% | -10.2% | +3.3% |
| 3M | -0.5% | +11.6% | -12.1% | -2.6% |
| 6M | +4.7% | +17.5% | -12.7% | +1.4% |
| YTD | +8.4% | +15.3% | -6.9% | +5.1% |
| 1Y | +7.2% | +26.3% | -19.1% | +2.1% |
| All | +46.7% | +35.5% | +11.1% | +39.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling