+60.7%
FDX vs SCHG
+84.7%
-24.0%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -2.7% | -1.1% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -2.2% | -1.1% | -2.0% |
| 3M | -2.0% | +6.2% | -8.1% | -5.4% |
| 6M | +8.0% | +13.4% | -5.3% | +0.3% |
| YTD | +35.0% | +7.1% | +27.9% | +29.3% |
| 1Y | +73.7% | +12.5% | +61.2% | +61.1% |
| All | +60.7% | +84.7% | -24.0% | +2.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling