+65.5%
FDX vs NIO
-59.9%
+125.4%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +5.9% | -8.7% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +5.6% | -7.2% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +6.6% | -4.2% | +10.8% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -2.1% | -26.3% | +24.2% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +2.2% | -42.5% | +44.7% | +6.5% |
| YTD | +33.9% | -33.5% | +67.5% | +37.2% |
| 1Y | +50.2% | -52.7% | +102.9% | +58.5% |
| 3Y | +65.5% | -57.5% | +123.0% | +82.2% |
| All | +65.5% | -59.9% | +125.4% | +82.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling