+62.8%
FDX vs MTB
+118.5%
-55.7%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -0.6% | -2.0% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -3.3% | +2.8% | -6.1% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -4.2% | +2.8% | +0.7% |
| 3M | -4.5% | +7.8% | -12.3% | -8.2% |
| 6M | +9.4% | +14.8% | -5.4% | +1.9% |
| YTD | +36.0% | +20.8% | +15.2% | +23.5% |
| 1Y | +75.5% | +23.1% | +52.4% | +57.5% |
| 3Y | +62.8% | +114.8% | -52.0% | +17.8% |
| All | +62.8% | +118.5% | -55.7% | +17.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling