+58.5%
FDX vs HTZ
-76.0%
+134.5%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -0.6% | +4.1% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -16.4% | +16.6% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +9.3% | -15.1% | +24.4% | +10.4% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -28.2% | +28.7% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +5.3% | -73.1% | +78.4% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +38.6% | -68.3% | +106.9% | +49.6% |
| All | +58.5% | -76.0% | +134.5% | +75.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling