+70.2%
FDX vs EPAM
-31.1%
+101.2%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | +20.6% | -24.5% | -6.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | +23.0% | -20.1% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +9.6% | +51.6% | -42.0% | +3.3% |
| 3M | +2.4% | +50.8% | -48.5% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +9.2% | +51.1% | -41.9% | +2.4% |
| YTD | +37.7% | -19.1% | +56.8% | +42.7% |
| 1Y | +56.1% | +3.0% | +53.1% | +52.9% |
| All | +70.2% | -31.1% | +101.2% | +64.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling