+60.7%
FDX vs BBIO
+154.7%
-93.9%
-35.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -4.7% | +5.5% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -3.9% | -3.9% | 0.0% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -13.4% | +10.1% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -2.0% | +7.6% | -9.5% | -3.2% |
| 6M | +8.0% | -2.4% | +10.5% | +7.7% |
| YTD | +35.0% | -5.2% | +40.2% | +34.5% |
| 1Y | +73.7% | +36.9% | +36.8% | +64.4% |
| All | +60.7% | +154.7% | -93.9% | +37.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling