+75.6%
FCX vs XLC
-2.2%
+77.8%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.6% | +0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +3.1% | -1.4% | +4.5% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +8.1% | -0.9% | +9.0% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +18.9% | -0.3% | +19.3% | +19.6% |
| 6M | +26.6% | -5.2% | +31.8% | +34.7% |
| YTD | +51.2% | -5.3% | +56.5% | +60.9% |
| 1Y | +75.6% | -2.8% | +78.4% | +78.7% |
| All | +75.6% | -2.2% | +77.8% | +78.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling