+56.4%
FCX vs UMC
+238.8%
-182.4%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +2.4% | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.3% | +9.0% | -11.3% | -4.5% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +17.2% | -14.6% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +7.4% | +11.4% | -4.0% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +16.0% | +137.5% | -121.5% | -11.9% |
| YTD | +40.9% | +193.1% | -152.2% | -2.0% |
| 1Y | +56.4% | +240.3% | -183.9% | +2.6% |
| All | +56.4% | +238.8% | -182.4% | +2.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling