+102.7%
FCX vs ROST
+97.9%
+4.9%
-46.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ROST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | -0.4% | +5.8% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +0.2% | +5.5% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +10.1% | -10.0% | +20.0% | +14.3% |
| 3M | +20.2% | +1.2% | +19.0% | +19.2% |
| 6M | +29.7% | +8.9% | +20.7% | +24.4% |
| YTD | +51.9% | +28.1% | +23.9% | +36.7% |
| 1Y | +66.0% | +53.0% | +13.0% | +39.1% |
| 3Y | +102.7% | +97.9% | +4.9% | +45.2% |
| All | +102.7% | +97.9% | +4.9% | +45.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ROST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ROST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ROST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ROST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling