+97.6%
FCX vs LVS
-6.8%
+104.4%
-46.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LVS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.5% | +1.0% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +3.1% | -2.7% | +5.8% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +8.1% | -4.7% | +12.8% | +10.1% |
| 3M | +18.9% | -15.6% | +34.5% | +27.0% |
| 6M | +26.6% | -18.6% | +45.2% | +37.6% |
| YTD | +51.2% | -32.3% | +83.4% | +75.3% |
| 1Y | +75.6% | -18.0% | +93.6% | +84.8% |
| All | +97.6% | -6.8% | +104.4% | +76.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LVS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LVS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LVS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LVS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling