-97.9%
FCUV vs UMAC
+508.0%
-605.9%
-99.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | -6.4% | -0.6% | -6.4% |
| 7D | -63.8% | +3.3% | -67.0% | -64.4% |
| 30D | -14.7% | -10.4% | -4.3% | -15.8% |
| 3M | +65.3% | +1.8% | +63.6% | +59.0% |
| 6M | -68.5% | +40.7% | -109.2% | -71.5% |
| YTD | -83.0% | +90.9% | -173.9% | -85.2% |
| 1Y | -94.4% | +151.8% | -246.2% | -95.3% |
| All | -97.9% | +508.0% | -605.9% | -98.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling