-68.5%
FCUV vs TSLQ
-20.6%
-47.9%
-92.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TSLQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | +0.2% | -7.2% | -7.1% |
| 7D | -63.8% | -8.0% | -55.8% | -62.0% |
| 30D | -14.7% | -23.8% | +9.1% | -7.2% |
| 3M | +65.3% | -7.0% | +72.3% | +50.7% |
| 6M | -68.5% | -17.1% | -51.4% | -69.0% |
| All | -68.5% | -20.6% | -47.9% | -69.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TSLQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TSLQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TSLQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TSLQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling