-97.9%
FCUV vs LDOS
-31.1%
-66.8%
-98.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | -2.4% | +6.5% | +7.1% |
| 7D | -4.7% | -1.3% | -3.4% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -23.2% | +10.1% | -33.3% | -34.7% |
| 3M | -49.2% | -4.7% | -44.5% | -45.1% |
| 6M | -9.2% | +5.6% | -14.8% | -38.5% |
| YTD | -90.6% | -25.1% | -65.5% | -92.0% |
| 1Y | -97.9% | -31.7% | -66.2% | -98.2% |
| All | -97.9% | -31.1% | -66.8% | -98.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling