-99.3%
FCUV vs EAT
+585.9%
-685.2%
-99.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.3% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -72.0% | -6.2% | -65.8% | -71.2% |
| 30D | -8.0% | -3.0% | -5.0% | -6.9% |
| 3M | +66.3% | +45.6% | +20.6% | +62.5% |
| 6M | -75.3% | +53.5% | -128.8% | -75.8% |
| YTD | -83.0% | +49.6% | -132.6% | -83.3% |
| 1Y | -94.7% | +38.9% | -133.6% | -94.7% |
| All | -99.3% | +585.9% | -685.2% | -99.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling