+43.1%
FCEL vs NIO
-51.1%
+94.2%
-75.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.6% | +0.6% | +8.0% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +6.9% | -3.8% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -40.0% | -4.7% | -35.2% | -38.3% |
| 3M | -47.0% | -28.1% | -19.0% | -38.4% |
| 6M | -21.0% | -41.7% | +20.7% | -0.4% |
| YTD | +48.0% | -33.1% | +81.2% | +76.8% |
| All | +43.1% | -51.1% | +94.2% | +105.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling