+320.9%
FCEL vs NIO
-37.4%
+358.2%
-60.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +18.8% | -0.3% | +19.1% | +18.9% |
| 7D | +4.0% | -6.7% | +10.6% | +7.2% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -20.0% | +7.0% | -5.1% |
| 3M | +14.6% | -30.5% | +45.0% | +30.9% |
| 6M | +133.7% | -20.7% | +154.4% | +152.3% |
| YTD | +143.0% | -25.7% | +168.6% | +169.1% |
| 1Y | +320.9% | -38.6% | +359.4% | +468.2% |
| All | +320.9% | -37.4% | +358.2% | +468.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling