+42.4%
FCEL vs NIO
-54.1%
+96.5%
-70.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.0% | +3.4% | -9.4% | -7.7% |
| 7D | -14.9% | -0.6% | -14.3% | -14.6% |
| 30D | -41.7% | -3.5% | -38.2% | -40.4% |
| 3M | -53.2% | -30.7% | -22.5% | -44.2% |
| 6M | -19.0% | -45.6% | +26.6% | +5.6% |
| YTD | +44.2% | -35.3% | +79.5% | +76.0% |
| 1Y | +42.4% | -53.9% | +96.3% | +113.2% |
| All | +42.4% | -54.1% | +96.5% | +113.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling