-60.3%
FCEL vs LNT
+48.2%
-108.5%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | -1.1% | -5.6% | -6.4% |
| 7D | +15.1% | +0.2% | +14.9% | +15.1% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -0.5% | -15.9% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -5.3% | -5.5% | +0.3% | -4.8% |
| 6M | +124.5% | -3.8% | +128.3% | +122.8% |
| YTD | +126.7% | +6.8% | +119.8% | +112.6% |
| 1Y | +219.9% | +9.3% | +210.6% | +197.9% |
| All | -60.3% | +48.2% | -108.5% | -74.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling