-91.7%
FCEL vs EPAM
-81.9%
-9.8%
-98.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -2.4% | +4.3% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -15.8% | +2.0% | -17.8% | -16.2% |
| 30D | -29.3% | +6.5% | -35.8% | -30.7% |
| 3M | -30.1% | +19.9% | -50.1% | -34.6% |
| 6M | +74.4% | -16.9% | +91.4% | +79.4% |
| YTD | +104.5% | -42.9% | +147.4% | +133.0% |
| 1Y | +281.4% | -30.4% | +311.7% | +305.6% |
| 3Y | -66.1% | -54.7% | -11.4% | -60.1% |
| All | -91.7% | -81.9% | -9.8% | -86.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling