-62.6%
FCEL vs EOSE
+44.0%
-106.7%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.9% | -3.9% | -2.1% | -4.7% |
| 7D | +6.3% | +14.0% | -7.7% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -18.8% | -5.9% | -12.9% | -18.4% |
| 3M | -3.8% | -34.3% | +30.4% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +121.1% | -37.8% | +158.9% | +149.8% |
| YTD | +113.3% | -65.2% | +178.5% | +171.2% |
| 1Y | +173.5% | -41.9% | +215.4% | +198.8% |
| All | -62.6% | +44.0% | -106.7% | -76.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling