-65.4%
FCEL vs DECK
-3.0%
-62.4%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -15.8% | -2.2% | -13.6% | -15.6% |
| 30D | -29.3% | -13.6% | -15.7% | -28.4% |
| 3M | -30.1% | -21.2% | -8.9% | -28.7% |
| 6M | +74.4% | -21.1% | +95.5% | +77.0% |
| YTD | +104.5% | -17.2% | +121.7% | +105.9% |
| 1Y | +281.4% | -30.7% | +312.1% | +291.1% |
| All | -65.4% | -3.0% | -62.4% | -59.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling