+69.8%
FBTC vs ARMK
+102.7%
-32.9%
-53.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.9% | -1.7% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.4% | +5.3% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +23.0% | 0.0% | +23.0% | +22.7% |
| 3M | +25.6% | +6.7% | +18.9% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +9.0% | +38.8% | -29.8% | -3.5% |
| YTD | -8.9% | +55.2% | -64.1% | -22.8% |
| 1Y | -27.5% | +46.6% | -74.2% | -37.4% |
| All | +69.8% | +102.7% | -32.9% | +21.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling