-99.7%
FBLG vs VOO
+61.8%
-161.5%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.5% | -0.6% | -5.0% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -19.0% | +0.5% | -19.5% | -19.1% |
| 30D | +75.2% | -0.9% | +76.1% | +75.6% |
| 3M | +69.3% | +3.9% | +65.4% | +67.1% |
| 6M | -80.3% | +14.5% | -94.9% | -81.0% |
| YTD | -62.0% | +13.0% | -75.0% | -63.1% |
| 1Y | -85.0% | +19.4% | -104.4% | -85.6% |
| All | -99.7% | +61.8% | -161.5% | -98.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling