+90.1%
FAST vs NIO
-64.6%
+154.7%
-21.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -1.6% | +2.3% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -13.0% | +12.7% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -0.8% | -18.3% | +17.5% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +5.8% | -33.2% | +39.0% | +7.3% |
| 6M | +8.0% | -21.5% | +29.5% | +8.6% |
| YTD | +25.6% | -25.5% | +51.1% | +26.6% |
| 1Y | +0.8% | -38.0% | +38.8% | +2.1% |
| All | +90.1% | -64.6% | +154.7% | +87.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling