+48.2%
FANG vs ROIV
+230.5%
-182.3%
-42.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ROIV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +22.3% | -22.7% | -2.5% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +16.9% | -14.5% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +4.9% | +43.9% | -39.0% | +0.5% |
| 6M | +12.0% | +41.6% | -29.6% | +7.2% |
| YTD | +37.1% | +92.7% | -55.6% | +24.1% |
| 1Y | +52.3% | +210.2% | -157.9% | +25.0% |
| All | +48.2% | +230.5% | -182.3% | +15.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ROIV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ROIV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ROIV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ROIV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling