+50.0%
FANG vs EMB
+29.3%
+20.7%
-42.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EMB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -1.2% | +4.1% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -1.3% | +3.9% | +3.0% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -1.8% | +9.4% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +17.3% | +0.2% | +17.1% | +16.6% |
| YTD | +38.7% | +0.4% | +38.3% | +37.5% |
| 1Y | +51.6% | +2.8% | +48.8% | +47.1% |
| 3Y | +50.0% | +29.1% | +20.8% | +35.1% |
| All | +50.0% | +29.3% | +20.7% | +35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EMB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EMB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EMB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EMB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling