+51.6%
FANG vs AZO
-32.5%
+84.2%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.2% | 0.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -3.6% | +6.5% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -5.6% | +8.2% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -6.6% | +14.2% | +7.0% |
| 6M | +17.3% | -22.5% | +39.8% | +15.9% |
| YTD | +38.7% | -15.2% | +53.9% | +39.3% |
| 1Y | +51.6% | -33.9% | +85.6% | +50.9% |
| All | +51.6% | -32.5% | +84.2% | +50.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling