+42.9%
FANG vs AZO
-28.9%
+71.8%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +0.5% | -2.3% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +7.6% | -2.7% | +10.3% | +7.3% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -3.2% | +1.9% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +14.7% | -19.7% | +34.4% | +13.5% |
| YTD | +34.8% | -12.0% | +46.8% | +35.8% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | -29.5% | +72.5% | +38.1% |
| All | +42.9% | -28.9% | +71.8% | +38.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling