+51.6%
FANG vs ALHC
-19.9%
+71.6%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -1.2% | +1.0% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -6.9% | +9.8% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -6.7% | +9.3% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -37.7% | +45.3% | +4.0% |
| 6M | +17.3% | -30.0% | +47.3% | +15.5% |
| YTD | +38.7% | -36.2% | +74.8% | +33.2% |
| 1Y | +51.6% | -22.9% | +74.5% | +42.2% |
| All | +51.6% | -19.9% | +71.6% | +42.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling