+23.7%
EXC vs NIO
-64.6%
+88.3%
-18.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -1.6% | +0.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -13.0% | +13.3% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -18.3% | +14.6% | -3.5% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -33.2% | +31.9% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -9.7% | -21.5% | +11.8% | -9.7% |
| YTD | +2.9% | -25.5% | +28.4% | +3.0% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | -38.0% | +42.4% | +4.6% |
| All | +23.7% | -64.6% | +88.3% | +23.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling