+44.7%
EWZ vs GLDM
+128.8%
-84.0%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +6.5% | -0.5% | +7.0% | +6.6% |
| 30D | +4.8% | +4.4% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| 3M | +9.9% | -1.1% | +11.0% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +1.9% | -13.7% | +15.6% | +6.4% |
| YTD | +20.3% | +2.8% | +17.5% | +19.4% |
| 1Y | +35.6% | +24.8% | +10.8% | +26.8% |
| All | +44.7% | +128.8% | -84.0% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling