+19.0%
EWZ vs ECHO
+621.2%
-602.2%
-31.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +5.2% | -4.5% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -2.4% | +0.9% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -24.5% | -3.1% | -21.4% | -24.5% |
| 3M | -10.7% | +8.7% | -19.4% | -11.1% |
| 6M | -19.1% | -24.8% | +5.7% | -18.3% |
| YTD | +1.6% | -13.0% | +14.6% | +1.9% |
| 1Y | +4.3% | +33.9% | -29.6% | +2.9% |
| 3Y | +19.0% | +791.8% | -772.8% | +4.1% |
| All | +19.0% | +621.2% | -602.2% | +4.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling