+50.6%
EWT vs GLDM
-1.4%
+52.0%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.6% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +2.9% | -6.5% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -17.2% | -3.9% | -13.3% | -15.9% |
| 3M | -7.3% | -8.1% | +0.8% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -1.5% | -14.7% | +13.2% | +3.4% |
| YTD | +49.0% | -6.6% | +55.6% | +57.8% |
| 1Y | +50.6% | -2.1% | +52.7% | +56.6% |
| All | +50.6% | -1.4% | +52.0% | +56.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling