+156.3%
ETR vs NIO
-60.1%
+216.4%
-15.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -4.9% | +4.8% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -14.5% | +15.6% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -15.0% | +22.0% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +4.6% | -35.6% | +40.2% | +5.0% |
| 6M | +0.1% | -55.7% | +55.8% | +1.0% |
| YTD | +23.2% | -43.1% | +66.3% | +23.6% |
| 1Y | +20.6% | -53.5% | +74.1% | +21.3% |
| 3Y | +156.3% | -59.8% | +216.1% | +157.0% |
| All | +156.3% | -60.1% | +216.4% | +157.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling