+190.4%
ETN vs ZTS
-63.0%
+253.4%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +3.9% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -3.7% | +7.3% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -0.8% | -6.7% | -7.5% |
| 3M | +8.3% | -9.7% | +18.1% | +10.4% |
| 6M | +20.2% | -38.4% | +58.6% | +35.2% |
| YTD | +34.7% | -41.1% | +75.8% | +53.4% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -50.6% | +70.1% | +42.7% |
| 3Y | +85.5% | -59.1% | +144.6% | +130.3% |
| All | +190.4% | -63.0% | +253.4% | +266.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling