+68.0%
ETN vs NIO
-55.4%
+123.5%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -1.2% | +3.0% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +2.4% | -1.8% | +4.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -15.2% | -6.6% | -8.6% | -14.6% |
| 3M | -21.2% | -29.9% | +8.6% | -18.5% |
| 6M | -13.5% | -46.6% | +33.2% | -8.4% |
| YTD | +14.5% | -36.5% | +51.0% | +18.9% |
| 1Y | -0.9% | -51.1% | +50.3% | +5.0% |
| All | +68.0% | -55.4% | +123.5% | +72.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling