+81.1%
ETN vs NIO
-64.4%
+145.5%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.4% | +0.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +6.2% | -4.1% | +10.4% | +6.7% |
| 30D | -6.7% | -23.2% | +16.6% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +3.6% | -29.9% | +33.5% | +7.1% |
| 6M | +18.3% | -25.1% | +43.4% | +21.1% |
| YTD | +31.5% | -27.5% | +58.9% | +34.8% |
| 1Y | +20.6% | -41.1% | +61.6% | +25.3% |
| All | +81.1% | -64.4% | +145.5% | +86.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling