+178.7%
ETN vs FLNC
-70.4%
+249.0%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +2.5% | +1.5% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -4.1% | +7.6% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -7.5% | -24.8% | +17.3% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +8.3% | -59.1% | +67.4% | +18.5% |
| 6M | +20.2% | -42.0% | +62.1% | +23.9% |
| YTD | +34.7% | -49.8% | +84.5% | +39.1% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +43.1% | -23.6% | +8.1% |
| 3Y | +85.5% | -61.0% | +146.5% | +75.8% |
| All | +178.7% | -70.4% | +249.0% | +156.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling