+85.5%
ETN vs CLSK
+211.4%
-125.9%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +6.8% | -2.8% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +3.5% | +7.7% | -4.2% | +2.6% |
| 30D | -7.5% | +12.2% | -19.8% | -9.1% |
| 3M | +8.3% | -15.5% | +23.8% | +9.5% |
| 6M | +20.2% | +39.3% | -19.2% | +14.2% |
| YTD | +34.7% | +35.1% | -0.4% | +27.1% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +34.0% | -14.6% | +11.3% |
| 3Y | +85.5% | +226.3% | -140.7% | +56.3% |
| All | +85.5% | +211.4% | -125.9% | +56.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling