+65.1%
ETN vs ABCL
+210.0%
-144.9%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.3% | -0.8% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -9.3% | +2.3% | -11.6% | -9.5% |
| 30D | -17.3% | -0.7% | -16.6% | -17.3% |
| 3M | -20.1% | +33.4% | -53.6% | -23.4% |
| 6M | -11.3% | +137.8% | -149.1% | -22.7% |
| YTD | +12.5% | +264.3% | -251.8% | -8.6% |
| 1Y | -5.6% | +209.2% | -214.8% | -21.8% |
| All | +65.1% | +210.0% | -144.9% | +25.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling