-29.4%
ETHA vs NXT
+78.8%
-108.2%
-67.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +1.2% | -3.8% | -2.9% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -1.1% | +1.9% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +27.9% | -15.3% | +43.2% | +32.5% |
| 3M | +38.3% | -43.8% | +82.1% | +57.1% |
| 6M | +14.0% | -18.7% | +32.6% | +16.6% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -3.0% | -14.4% | -19.7% |
| 1Y | -42.7% | +22.7% | -65.4% | -47.1% |
| All | -29.4% | +78.8% | -108.2% | -29.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling