-27.0%
ETHA vs FLNC
-38.4%
+11.4%
-67.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.2% | +2.5% | +0.8% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +3.5% | -4.1% | +7.5% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +35.3% | -24.8% | +60.1% | +41.1% |
| 3M | +50.9% | -59.1% | +110.0% | +72.2% |
| 6M | +22.1% | -42.0% | +64.1% | +25.7% |
| YTD | -14.6% | -49.8% | +35.2% | -10.2% |
| 1Y | -42.8% | +43.1% | -85.9% | -51.9% |
| All | -27.0% | -38.4% | +11.4% | -45.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling