-28.7%
ETHA vs BLDR
-60.6%
+32.0%
-67.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -4.9% | +6.0% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.3% | +3.0% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +29.4% | -16.2% | +45.6% | +36.8% |
| 3M | +47.2% | -14.4% | +61.6% | +51.4% |
| 6M | +25.4% | -32.8% | +58.2% | +41.3% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -39.2% | +22.6% | -3.7% |
| 1Y | -42.3% | -57.7% | +15.4% | -20.3% |
| All | -28.7% | -60.6% | +32.0% | -5.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling