+96.4%
ET vs PENG
+101.4%
-5.0%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +6.4% | -6.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +4.5% | -3.7% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +7.5% | -7.1% | +14.6% | +7.7% |
| 3M | +11.4% | -27.3% | +38.7% | +12.2% |
| 6M | +18.5% | +169.6% | -151.0% | +9.9% |
| YTD | +37.4% | +164.6% | -127.2% | +27.2% |
| 1Y | +30.9% | +109.5% | -78.5% | +22.8% |
| All | +96.4% | +101.4% | -5.0% | +79.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling