+96.4%
ET vs ACGL
+34.2%
+62.2%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -1.7% | +2.0% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -0.7% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +7.5% | -1.0% | +8.5% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +11.0% | +0.4% | +9.4% |
| 6M | +18.5% | -0.3% | +18.9% | +18.4% |
| YTD | +37.4% | +2.3% | +35.1% | +36.4% |
| 1Y | +30.9% | +6.4% | +24.6% | +28.9% |
| All | +96.4% | +34.2% | +62.2% | +88.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling